26 october 2015

Conflict resolved in connection with refusal of an insurance company to compensate medical costs for treatment of decompression sickness

As a result of the involvement of the Office's lawyers in resolving a disputatious situation, the matter was settled with payment from SK VTB Strakhovaniye (a top 10 insurance company in Russia) of insurance compensation to the Medical Center POSEIDONIA (Larnaka, Republic of Cyprus), which had carried out expensive treatment of an insured person in the compression therapy division.
14 july 2015

Challenging an illegal corporate restructuring following a triumph in a replevin case

Jus Aureum’s lawyers upheld the property interests of the client by preventing its takeover by a front party posing as a shareholder in the company, whereby an entry on the termination of Gidroplast-Engineering CJSC could have appeared in that register and the malefactors could have illegally obtained control over its assets.
25 june 2015

Successfully defending SovInterAvtoServis Open Joint Stock Company in the Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Circuit

The Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Circuit has rejected a cassation appeal lodged by Montazhspetzstroi Limited Liability Company in Case No. А40-119766/2014 opened upon an action brought by SovInterAvtoServis OJSC for the recovery of an advance payment in the amount of more than RUB 66 million following the respondent’s failure to do contracted construction work on the IVECO concern’s dealership in the Moscow Region.
10 february 2015

Upholding the interests of Megapolis group companies in tax disputes over their right to refunds of the tax amounts overpaid through the fault of tax agents

The litigation (Case No. VAS-7764/13) resulted in the Supreme Arbitrazh (Commercial) Court of the Russian Federation taking a stand to allow new opportunities in Russian enforcement practice by allowing taxpayers to themselves choose the remedy to reinstate their injured rights under the circumstances, i.e. to apply to a tax authority for a refund or to reclaim the tax surplus by suing the tax agent as the debtor having defaulted under the respective civil-law obligation.