Highlights

14 december 2016

Jus Aureum advised Dixy Group of Companies on sale of part of real property belonging to the Seventh Continent.

Jus Aureum acted as Russian legal counsel for Dixy Group of Companies in a transaction for acquisition from LLC Mcapital of 12 real property assets in Kaliningrad with total area of about 30 000 sq. m.

28 september 2016

Advising a group holding company of one of the leading FMCG distributors in the CIS in a transaction on sale and purchase of shares in the holding company

Advising and legal support of a group holding company of one of the leading FMCG distributors in the CIS in a transaction on sale and purchase of shares in the holding company.

20 april 2016

The Ninth Arbitrazh Court of Appeals agreed with the position of Jus Aureum in rejecting the complaint against the ruling to abandon a suit

In December 2015, lawyers from Jus Aureum were successful in achieving the abandonment by the Arbitrazh Court of the city of Moscow of a statement of claim by UK Sodruzhestvo LLC in case No. А40-139187/2015 for the recovery of unjust enrichment from Giproplast Engineering JSC by proving that this case was identical to case No. А40-29304/2015, which had been considered earlier.

17 march 2016

Jus Aureum Wins Thin Capitalization Case in the Russian Supreme Court

Now, however, the Russian Supreme Court concluded in Case No. А40-87775/2015 that as interest is paid to a Russian recipient, the Russian borrower should not be expected to pay dividends as a tax agent (Article 269.4 of the Tax Code). The interest in such cases is not to be treated as dividends.

15 january 2016

Jus Aureum assisted a German producer of automation equipment in collecting data from a Russian company

The Arbitrazh Court of the city of Moscow granted in full the stated claims of Beckhoff Automation LLC – a subsidiary company of the German group of companies Beckhoff Automation GmbH – against Ekonomicheskiye Programmy LLC of debt denominated in euro, which had accrued in connection with the failure to pay for products (case No. А40-205973/2015).

27 december 2015

In December 2015 Jus Aureum achieved a victory in disputes on establishing a cadastral value, collecting tortious damages and adjudgment of unjustified enrichment

3 december 2015

Jus Aureum successfully defended the interests of the general director of one of the largest companies in Russia as part of a series of five court cases concerning administrative offences under part 1 Article 15.6 KoAP

In court, the lawyers of Jus Aureum managed to prove the absence of grounds for bringing the general director to administrative liability for the alleged violation, as the list and the deadline for presenting the documents requested had been set by the tax authority itself, rather than by the legislation on taxes and duties.

2 december 2015

Arbitrazh Court of the City of Moscow dismissed a claim for recovery of 30 million rubles as unjust enrichment after the claimant's attempt to recover that amount in a restitution procedure

In case No. А40-139187/2015, lawyers from Jus Aureum achieved the dismissal of the statement of claim of MK Sodruzhestvo LLC for recovery of unjust enrichment from Giproplast Engineering CJSC.

24 november 2015

Jus Aureum succeeded in having an Arbitrazh Court levy a fine of 100,000 rubles for a construction company's failure to implement a court decision

Upon the application of lawyers from Jus Aureum, the Arbitrazh Court of the City of Moscow levied a judicial penalty on a company that had not returned debt to the plaintiff in the course of the year after it was sentenced to do so by a decision of the court which entered into legal force in case No. А40-119766/2014.

Further